As I look at the past
seven weeks in this course, I realize I have come a long way, technologically
speaking. I am walking away with a
quiver that has many more technological arrows: VoiceThread, Lucid Chart, and
Jay Cut to name a few. At the same time,
I have discovered new ways to use all of those “old technologies” in new
ways. For example, I have learned how to
take PowerPoint off the screen at the front of the class and place into the
hands of the students, allowing them to direct their own learning. Beyond the tools themselves, I have learned
about the theories behind their application.
For the first time in my career, I actually understand the accepted
learning theories of the day enough to apply those findings to my classroom in
a way that is transforming my teaching. In
the following blog, I would like to discuss several of these revelations and
explain how they will affect my classroom.
After studying each learning theory in depth, I believe
that there is not one clear winner. By this,
I mean that each learning theory, from Behaviorism to Connectivism, has pieces
that are essential to any modern classroom.
To expand further, I do not believe a teacher can be successful by
relying on just one of these theories. If
I only used Behaviorism in my classroom, I believe students would not only be missing
valuable learning, but they would rebel at a structure that does not match everyday
life. On the opposite side of the
spectrum, I do not believe a classroom can run strictly on Social Constructionism,
as there is a time and a place for working on something alone. Therefore, I see my own classroom as cycling
through all of the learning theories we have discussed, as they all have value
at different times.
This has created a
paradigm shift in my instructional practice.
I have always felt that technology integration is essential in a modern
classroom. However, I let the technology
dictate the learning strategy and guide instruction. I now realize that this could be akin to a
hammer guiding a carpenter; it just does not make sense. My new plan is to select the learning
strategy that will give my students the best chance at learning the
information. I will then determine what
the best piece of technology is and how it should be used to target that
strategy.
A second set of technology I would like to get my
students into is that of video creation.
Looking at websites like YouTube, this seems to be a trend that is not
going away. In terms of actual implementation,
I think that the first step is to create some stop animation films using
digital cameras. In this way, students
can think more about what they are doing while creating their artifact. It will also give us a chance to get our feet
wet with online editing software like Jay Cut before moving into actual
footage. I believe this type of
technology not only increases engagement, but increases learning.
A second long-term goal has to do more directly with
technology. During the next year, I will
implement technology at least once a week.
In defining the technology tool, I would like to make it clear that this
does not mean I use PowerPoint in front of the class. This means that the technology is used as a
learning tool in the hands of the students.
If this goal matches with the previous goal then I believe that is even
better.
No comments:
Post a Comment